Current research on defensins against Staphylococcus aureus

Current Bioscience. 2021;1(1):e05

*  Independent researcher, Torrevieja, Spain

^ Corresponding author: Marco Palma, phd@marcopalma.es

Main text

Defensins are small cysteine-rich cationic peptides, found in a broad range of species in animal and plant kingdoms. It has been identified three sub-classes of defensins (e.g. α, β, and θ) which have conserved six cysteine signature (1). They play an important role as host defense peptides with activity against bacteria, fungi and many enveloped and nonenveloped viruses. They are usually between 18 and 45 amino acids long, with three or four highly conserved disulfide bonds. In the last two years, several studies have been done on defensins against Staphylococcus aureus

Human defensins have been nicely reviewed by Fruitwala et al (2019)(2). In brief, human defensins are members of a large family of antimicrobial cationic peptides of approximately 30 amino acids. They can be classified according to their disulfide bond linkages into α-, and β- defensins. Most members of the same family share a similar structure. They play an important function in the immune response against pathogens due to their broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity. Human defensins are produced mainly by neutrophils and epithelial cells and to a lesser extent by monocytes, macrophages, dendritic cells, and lymphocytes.

Current works in this area focus on the human defensins HBD2-3, HNP-1, and Phd1-3. In a recent study, Bolatchiev (2020) investigated the effect of HNP-1, hBD-1, and hBD-3, and their combination with rifampicin or amikacin against clinical isolates of S. aureus (3). The most effective antimicrobial combination against S.aureus was hBD-3 with rifampicin, having a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 1 compared with microbial MIC values of 4 and 8 of HNP-1 and hBD-1, respectively. These antimicrobial peptides demonstrated a synergistic impact on the majority of isolates studied when they are used together with rifampicin and amikacin. This can be attributed to the ability of human defensins to enhance the permeability of bacterial membranes and by extent the access of antibiotics into the periplasm and cytoplasm of bacterial cells (4). Scudiero et al. (2020) reviewed the importance of antimicrobial peptides in the pathogenesis of S. aureus cutaneous diseases including psoriasis and atopic dermatitis. Expression of  HBD2 and 3 are downregulated in patients with atopic dermatitis while they are upregulated in patients with psoriasis and rosacea. The decreased expression could be explained by the activation of cytokines which repress the expression of antimicrobial peptides (5).

It has been demonstrated that some defensins (e.g. human enteric defensin 5) inhibit the pro-inflammatory cytokine TNF-α in LPS-stimulated macrophages by blocking the interaction between LPS and LPS-binding protein (6). However, the antibacterial activity of HBD 2-3, Phd1-3, and MPhd1-3 against Staphylococcus aureus is decreased in the presence of LPS. It seems that the native defensin amino acid sequence or structure is also not essential for this, however, the cationic charges are necessary for binding to LPS (7).

Rodriguez et al. (2019) identified two novel putative peptides (hBDconsensus and hBD10) that seemed to belong to the human β-defensin family showed antimicrobial activity against Staphylococcus aureus (8)

Plant defensins are an extensive family of small, highly stable, and cysteine-rich peptides with a conserved tertiary structure that consists of a triple-stranded antiparallel b-sheet and a-helix (9). Al Kashgry and colleagues demonstrated the recombinant peptide MzDef, a defensin from Maize, could be utilized as a potential antimicrobial peptide against different species of fungi and bacteria including S. aureus (10). In another study, it was investigated in vitro the broad-spectrum activities of recombinant defensin (SDmod) which sequence is based on the sequence of the gene sd2 from Sunflower. Their results indicated that Sdmod can absorb heavy metals like cadmium and zinc and have antibacterial activity against S. aureus (11)

Insect defensins compose approximately 40 amino acid (AA) residues, with an N-terminal loop, an α-helical fragment, followed by an anti-parallel β-sheet cross-linked by three disulfide bonds (CSαβ)(12). They have antimicrobial activity against several gram-positive bacteria, including methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) (13).

DLP4 is an insect defensin from the hemolymph of Hermetia illucens larvae was used as a starting template for the rational design of a novel class of “CSαβ” antimicrobial peptide. Of the designed peptides, ID13 demonstrated to have reduced cytotoxicity and antibacterial activity against S. aureus. This peptide could penetrate and damage the cell membrane of S. aureus, which would lead to increased potassium ion leakage. Measurement of the number of viable bacteria remaining at various times after exposure to the peptides in vitro showed that ID13 killed more than 99 percent of S. aureus in less than an hour. 10 mg/kg ID13 reduced the number of  S. aureus to 1.8 log10 (CFU/g) (CFU: colony-forming units) in infected mouse thigh muscles and decreased the levels of TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-10 levels. These results suggest that ID13 has the potential to be a promising antimicrobial agent for therapeutic purposes (14).

One of the humoral effector molecules in ticks are defensins, which are a family of small peptides with a conserved γ-core motif, which is essential for their antimicrobial activity (15). A novel defensin-like peptide (Ds-defensin) from ticks showed potent antimicrobial activity against several gram-positive bacteria including Staphylococcus aureus (16). It seems that Ds-defensin formed pores after a 30-min exposure to the Ds-defensin peptide. This finding provides future perspectives for the development of antimicrobial therapeutic drugs. Ixodes holocyclus is a species of Australian tick that produces defensins with a preserved γ-core motif that is critical for their antimicrobial activity. Its transcriptome analysis revealed the presence of five defensins, of which two had antimicrobial activity against S. aureus. This study found a multigene defensin family in I. holocyclus with wide antimicrobial activity (15).

Big defensins are antimicrobial peptides related to β-defensins with a unique structure usually described in marine organisms, mainly mollusks. They composed of a highly hydrophobic N-terminal region and a cationic C-terminal region containing six cysteine residues involved in three internal disulfide bridges (17). Loth et al. (2019) tested the bactericidal activity of the defensins BigDef1 from oyster Crassostrea gigas against multidrug-resistant human clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. Their finding indicates that the ancestral N-terminal domain confers salt-stable antimicrobial activity to the β defensin-like domain. It triggers the Cg-BigDef1 assembly, which captures and kills bacteria. It is important to note that BigDef1 does not appear to be cytotoxic to mammalian cells (18).

Keywords: defensin, antimicrobial peptide, staphylococcus aureus, human defensin, plant defensin.

 

Sources of information

An extensive literature review was conducted in PubMed’s databases on autoimmune diseases, autoantibodies, and molecular mimicry in combination with the keywords bacteria and pathogen.

Declarations

Ethical approval

Not required.

Author contributions

M.P. was the sole author of this article.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Declaration of competing interest

M.P. is Editor-in-Chief of Current Bioscience and a member of Current Bioscience editorial board. This article was reviewed by Current Bioscience editors and reviewers. The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ganz T. Defensins: antimicrobial peptides of vertebrates. C R Biol [Internet]. 2004 Jun;327(6):539–49. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S163106910400006X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2003.12.007
  2. Fruitwala S, El-Naccache DW, Chang TL. Multifaceted immune functions of human defensins and underlying mechanisms. Semin Cell Dev Biol [Internet]. 2019 Apr;88:163–72. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1084952117304159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2018.02.023
  3. Bolatchiev A. Antibacterial activity of human defensins against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. PeerJ [Internet]. 2020 Nov 25;8:e10455. Available from: https://peerj.com/articles/10455. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10455
  4. Zharkova MS, Orlov DS, Golubeva OY, Chakchir OB, Eliseev IE, Grinchuk TM, et al. Application of Antimicrobial Peptides of the Innate Immune System in Combination With Conventional Antibiotics—A Novel Way to Combat Antibiotic Resistance? Front Cell Infect Microbiol [Internet]. 2019 Apr 30;9. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fcimb.2019.00128/full. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2019.00128
  5. Scudiero O, Brancaccio M, Mennitti C, Laneri S, Lombardo B, De Biasi MG, et al. Human Defensins: A Novel Approach in the Fight against Skin Colonizing Staphylococcus aureus. Antibiotics [Internet]. 2020 Apr 21;9(4):198. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/9/4/198. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9040198
  6. Wang C, Shen M, Zhang N, Wang S, Xu Y, Chen S, et al. Reduction Impairs the Antibacterial Activity but Benefits the LPS Neutralization Ability of Human Enteric Defensin 5. Sci Rep [Internet]. 2016 Sep 10;6(1):22875. Available from: http://www.nature.com/articles/srep22875. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22875
  7. Krishnakumari V, Binny TM, Adicherla H, Nagaraj R. Escherichia coli Lipopolysaccharide Modulates Biological Activities of Human-β-Defensin Analogues but Not Non-Ribosomally Synthesized Peptides. ACS Omega [Internet]. 2020 Mar 31;5(12):6366–75. Available from: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.9b03770. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b03770
  8. Rodriguez A, Pedersen MØ, Villegas E, Rivas‐Santiago B, Villegas‐Moreno J, Amero C, et al. Antimicrobial activity and structure of a consensus human β‐defensin and its comparison to a novel putative hBD10. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinforma [Internet]. 2020 Jan 30;88(1):175–86. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/prot.25785. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.25785
  9. Parisi K, Shafee TMA, Quimbar P, van der Weerden NL, Bleackley MR, Anderson MA. The evolution, function and mechanisms of action for plant defensins. Semin Cell Dev Biol [Internet]. 2019 Apr;88:107–18. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S108495211730469X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2018.02.004
  10. Al Kashgry NAT, Abulreesh HH, El-Sheikh IA, Almaroai YA, Salem R, Mohamed I, et al. Utilization of a recombinant defensin from Maize (Zea mays L.) as a potential antimicrobial peptide. AMB Express [Internet]. 2020 Dec 25;10(1):208. Available from: https://amb-express.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s13568-020-01146-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-020-01146-9
  11. Mirakhorli N, Norolah Z, Foruzandeh S, Shafizade F, Nikookhah F, Saffar B, et al. Multi-function Plant Defensin, Antimicrobial and Heavy Metal Adsorbent Peptide. Iran J Biotechnol [Internet]. 2019 Sep 1;17(3):43–9. Available from: http://www.ijbiotech.com/article_91759.html. https://doi.org/10.29252/ijb.1562
  12. Cornet B, Bonmatin J-M, Hetru C, Hoffmann JA, Ptak M, Vovelle F. Refined three-dimensional solution structure of insect defensin A. Structure [Internet]. 1995 May;3(5):435–48. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0969212601001770. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00177-0
  13. Józefiak A, Engberg R. Insect proteins as a potential source of antimicrobial peptides in livestock production. A review. J Anim Feed Sci [Internet]. 2017 May 15;26(2):87–99. Available from: http://www.journalssystem.com/jafs/Insect-proteins-as-a-potential-source-of-antimicrobial-peptides-in-livestock-production,69998,0,2.html. https://doi.org/10.22358/jafs/69998/2017
  14. Li B, Yang N, Wang X, Hao Y, Mao R, Li Z, et al. An Enhanced Variant Designed From DLP4 Cationic Peptide Against Staphylococcus aureus CVCC 546. Front Microbiol [Internet]. 2020 Jun 5;11. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01057/full. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01057
  15. Cabezas-Cruz A, Tonk M, Bleackley MR, Valdés JJ, Barrero RA, Hernández-Jarguín A, et al. Antibacterial and antifungal activity of defensins from the Australian paralysis tick, Ixodes holocyclus. Ticks Tick Borne Dis [Internet]. 2019 Oct;10(6):101269. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1877959X19302183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2019.101269
  16. Li F, Gao Z, Wang K, Zhao Y, Wang H, Zhao M, et al. A novel defensin-like peptide contributing to antimicrobial and antioxidant capacity of the tick Dermacentor silvarum (Acari: Ixodidae). Exp Appl Acarol [Internet]. 2021 Feb 16;83(2):271–83. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10493-020-00584-1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-020-00584-1
  17. Rosa RD, Santini A, Fievet J, Bulet P, Destoumieux-Garzón D, Bachère E. Big Defensins, a Diverse Family of Antimicrobial Peptides That Follows Different Patterns of Expression in Hemocytes of the Oyster Crassostrea gigas. Nigou J, editor. PLoS One [Internet]. 2011 Sep 28;6(9):e25594. Available from: https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025594. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025594
  18. Loth K, Vergnes A, Barreto C, Voisin SN, Meudal H, Da Silva J, et al. The Ancestral N-Terminal Domain of Big Defensins Drives Bacterially Triggered Assembly into Antimicrobial Nanonets. Davies BW, Trent MS, editors. MBio [Internet]. 2019 Oct 22;10(5). Available from: https://mbio.asm.org/content/10/5/e01821-19. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01821-19

 

Table of contents

License: